The Milwaukee Bucks Vs Pacers Match Player Stats produced a wildly entertaining contest when the two Eastern Conference rivals met at Fiserv Forum on the evening of Sunday, March 15, 2026, with tip-off at 7:30pm local time.
In a game that showcased the full firepower of both franchises, the Bucks ran out 134-123 winners in a performance defined by elite scoring output, relentless pace, and a stunning contribution from bench player Bobby Portis that took the game away from Indiana in the second half.
The Bucks trailed significantly after the opening period, finding themselves down 34-26 at the end of the first quarter as the Pacers dictated tempo with aggressive off-ball movement and crisp ball rotation.
Milwaukee responded emphatically in the second and third quarters, outscoring Indiana 36-31 and then 40-31 respectively to seize control and build a lead that ultimately proved unassailable.
Giannis Antetokounmpo was characteristically dominant, finishing with 31 points, 14 rebounds and 8 assists in another commanding display of two-way basketball from the franchise centrepiece.
Bobby Portis was the standout performer of the evening from an individual output perspective, erupting for 29 points and 10 rebounds from the bench in a double-double performance that shot 54.5% from three-point range on 11 attempts.
Ryan Rollins added 20 points in an efficient showing from the guard position, shooting 66.7% from the field and contributing 7 assists alongside 3 steals in a breakout display.
For Indiana, the absence of any single player capable of consistently matching the Bucks’ interior physicality proved decisive, with Jay Huff leading the scoring on 16 points off the bench while Jarace Walker produced 14 points and 8 rebounds in a composed showing.
Milwaukee Bucks Vs Pacers Match Player Stats — Full Box Score
Milwaukee Bucks — Player Stats
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giannis Antetokounmpo | F | 31 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | — | +17 |
| Bobby Portis | F | 29 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 52.4 | 54.5 | -4 |
| Ryan Rollins | G | 20 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 66.7 | 60.0 | +14 |
| Myles Turner | C | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 57.1 | 50.0 | +6 |
| Taurean Prince | F | 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 71.4 | 60.0 | +13 |
| AJ Green | G | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 57.1 | 57.1 | +8 |
| Kyle Kuzma | F | 8 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 42.9 | 33.3 | -1 |
| Jericho Sims | C | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | — | +1 |
Indiana Pacers — Player Stats
| Player | POS | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG% | 3P% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Huff | C | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 62.5 | 50.0 | -15 |
| Jarace Walker | F | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 50.0 | 33.3 | -17 |
| Obi Toppin | F | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 42.9 | 42.9 | +2 |
| Ivica Zubac | C | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 40.0 | — | +1 |
| Kobe Brown | F | 9 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | 66.7 | -11 |
| Taelon Peter | G | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | 50.0 | -2 |
| Quenton Jackson | G | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 40.0 | 33.3 | +1 |
| Jalen Slawson | F | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 25.0 | 33.3 | -4 |
| Kam Jones | G | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 | — | +2 |
| Micah Potter | C | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | +3 |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Milwaukee Bucks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 134 | 123 |
| FG% | 54.4% | 51.9% |
| 3P% | 52.3% | 50.0% |
| Rebounds | 43 | 48 |
| Assists | 31 | 34 |
| Steals | 10 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 19 |
| Points in Paint | 38 | 30 |
| Bench Points | 50 | 55 |
| Fast Break Points | 15 | 10 |
How The Milwaukee Bucks Vs Pacers Match Player Stats Were Shaped
Turnovers were the decisive narrative thread in this contest, with Indiana committing 19 compared to Milwaukee’s nine — a disparity the Bucks ruthlessly converted into 27 points off turnovers.
Giannis’s +17 plus-minus was the highest on the floor across both rosters, a reflection of his relentless impact on both ends of the hardwood throughout the evening.
The Bucks bench outperformed in quality where it counted most, with Portis in particular seizing the initiative in the third quarter when Milwaukee stretched their lead to as many as 19 points.
Indiana’s bench scored 55 points in total, a figure that would have been sufficient to win most contests, but an inability to protect the ball in critical moments undermined their challenge throughout.
