Date: 29th October 2012 at 1:06pm
Written by:

The Manchester United Chelsea game at Stamford Bridge yesterday was meant to be a dramatic encounter between the top two sides in the league at the moments and it was just that. 

But what was meant to be a theatrical spectacle between two teams that had scored 40 goals between them, started as a monologue in front of 41,644 people as Sir Alex’s Ferguson’s side were the only side saying anything. United finding the net twice in the first twelve minutes confirmed that the game would have goals but with United’s defensive frailties Chelsea would always have a chance.

Slowly the home side began to remember their lines and by the 53rd minute Juan Mata and Ramires had brought them level, setting the stage for a ‘villain’ to steal the headlines.

There was inevitably uproar as Mark Clattenburg showed red cards to both Ivanovic and Torres as well as allowing an offside goal from Javier Hernandez to stand, with these decisions swinging a game that was perhaps getting away from United in our favour. But there was more to the game than this.

Here are 5 things we learned from yesterday’s game:

Sir Alex Ferguson has real options

Many had expected United to go with the narrower diamond formation in an attempt to contain Chelsea in the middle of the park but instead the United reverted to the 4-4-2, employing Valencia and Young on the wings. It was an unexpected move and one that paid off as Valencia ran Cole ragged (as usual0 setting up RVP’s second whilst it was Young that was brought down by Ivanovic, leading to the Serb defender to see red.

Mark Lawrenson called it a ‘masterstroke’ and ‘bold’ as United decided to fight fire with fire, rather than try and contain Chelsea and reaped the rewards.

The beautiful thing is United now have a number of effective formations to call on which will leave managers guessing right up until they see the teamsheet as to how to deal with Sir Alex’s side.

David De Gea needs to be Manchester United’s #1

The Spanish goalkeeper seems to enjoy playing against Chelsea and yesterday was an important figure in our win as he made a number of important saves to keep Chelsea at bay as they attempted to get back into the game.

He is sometimes unorthodox and still has other areas of his game to work on but he is a good young goalkeeper that will become brilliant. His shot stopping makes for some great highlight reel stuff and if the rest of his game gets to this level, we will be set for years to come considering he is just 21.

A very un-Manchester United characteristic

Having hailed David De Gea, it’s only right we look at why.

Normally when Manchester United go 2-0 up against anyone it signals the end of a game, but in recent times we have allowed teams a way back in and against a side as strong as Chelsea this is tantamount to suicide.

Our defence continues to lack a settled feel about it and it is worrying that Chelsea seemed to set off panic alarms with almost every attack.

In our current state teams know they have a chance against thus will have a go, so the sooner we shape up at the back the easier these games will be not only for the team but for our hearts as well!

Yesterday’s officiating

Mark Clattenburg has been at the center of a storm ever since he showed Fernando Torres a red (Ivanovic’s was a sending off no matter what way you look at it) and rightly so. Many have rightly claimed his decisions turned the game in United’s favour and whilst I’m not complaining, poor officiating is poor officiating and it always seems to rear it head when United play Chelsea.

Drogba’s offside goal against us in April 2010? The freekick that lead to John Terry’s winner in November 2009? The penalty given against Carrick in May 2008? Luiz’s persistently committing fouls yet remaining on the pitch in April 2011? The soft penalty that won the game for them in that same game? Torres nearly decapitating Cleverley yesterday?

Yes as you can tell I am FAR from sympathetic to Chelsea’s complaints, and in fact I am quite pleased we won in the manner that we did as it is normally us that is getting short shrift when we face Chelsea.

Chelsea’s fans remain as classy as ever

Like those at Anfield, Chelsea’s fans haven’t quite grasped the concept of how things work. If you are racially abused you are the victim, so to hear them continually boo Rio Ferdinand was disappointing to say the least. Like in January, Ferdinand, who’s only crime was to stand up for his brother, was mercilessly hounded by those at Stamford Bridge but had the last laugh as United won the game.

His defiant pose after Hernandez’s winner saw a shower of missiles aimed at the pitch but Chelsea will have to make do with being second best  as United held on to their lead, as well as scum.

 

17 responses to “Five Things We Learned: Manchester United vs Chelsea”

  1. Rich says:

    Mark Lawrence(wrong name) called it a ‘masterstroke’ and ‘bold’ as United decided to fight fire with fire, rather than try and contain Chelsea and reaped the rewards.

  2. Eidur says:

    Easy to pick things out to suit your agenda where decisions are concerned…

    For example, Mikel’s ridiculous red during Grant’s first game in 07 then you scored when injury time had elapsed before diving for a penalty all in the same game. In 2010 Macheda handled the ball into the net and Neville was very lucky not to be sent marching for persistent fouling. Last season United earned two dubious penalties in a 3-3 draw.

    Secondly, so so incredibly low to suggest Rio was being booed because of anything Terry had done. Rio was charged for endorsing a racist comment towards Ashley Cole and again you’re picking things out of context to suit your agenda.

    Nothing said about Hernandez’s classy goading of the home fans in a hostile atmosphere or the chants about Matthew Harding’s death by some (not all) away fans.

    • Chudi says:

      I presume this was why you were booing him in January too right?

      • Eidur says:

        I don’t really remember a time when we didn’t boo Rio, a product of scummy West Ham who went to dirty Leeds and then upped our hatred towards him by going to another side we’re not fond of.

  3. united are scum says:

    Rio was punished by the FA for a racial insult towards Cole on twitter but as usual UTD’s wrongdoings are always swept aside and forgotten quickly.Just like Giggs’ infidelity including an 8 year affair with his brother’s wife.

    • kb32904 says:

      WTF has Giggs’ infidelity got to do with what happens on the pitch ??? In any case, with JT in the Chelsea team, a tad hypocritical to complain about Giggs !

    • Eidur says:

      Not sure what Giggs has to do with it, who cares if he poked his brother’s missus?

      • Scum blighted says:

        I thought gaggs was rooting his brother behind their wives (sisters) backs?
        More united take off fails please.
        Wouldn’t it be nice

  4. segun says:

    Complementing what eidur said in the above comment. United’s first 2goals last season at old trafford were offside. So yes, ure just picking out events to suit your argument.

  5. Marlowe says:

    And Chelski’s first few goals were created from dives/soft fouls by Hazard. Oh how your memory is so funny.

  6. akin says:

    Man utd were denied a clear penalty when David luiz handled the ball in the box which would have made it 3-0. But cuz It’s United one mentions it

  7. akin says:

    I meant no one mentions it.

  8. akin says:

    Some of the tripe I’ve heard the conspiracy theorists spout in the last 24hrs has been laughable and a lot of the info they have brought out is completely misleading.

  9. kieran says:

    always funny coming on here after united have a big win…I never understood why opposition fans vent their spleen on our websites, I wouldn’t dream about going to a chelsea website to spew shite. The ftermath of the cup game against liverpool in 2011 was also a humourous few hours on here.

    Anyway well done the reds but the focus must quickly turn to arsenal on saturday

  10. Jonathan says:

    Funny thing in the midst of these conspiracy theories is that ultimately these things balance out. Sure we’ve had calls go our way but there’s no way it can be denied that many have gone there’s too. Even when you look at Sunday’s game, it’s perfectly reasonable to argue that Torres’ second yellow essentially levelled out what should’ve been a clear red in the first half.
    The 3-3 comeback last season was no different in that one of the penalties we won were questionable, yet even Cahill admitted he could’ve been sent off very early in the game for taking down Welbeck as the last defender.
    Instead of counting biased calls let’s just do a trophy count…